Nuclear Attitudes

Nuclear war is an inhumane act against humanity and Orbis

The perpetrators of nuclear attacks are only acceptable in retaliatory attacks however context matters when viewed in any light.


consequences of nuclear warfare

Loss of  life and military forces are immense, the nation attacked will be irradiated for a period of time resulting in a higher disease rate and thus more people dead, this is followed by the Orbis wide effect of negative food production / +Radon to continents.


who should i talk to about nuclear law?

The U.N.O is most likely the best place to discuss topics like this


how should i counter radiation?

There is no way to 'counter' radiation but we can take precautions and holt the launch of these nuclear weapons. How? talking to your alliance or/and nations around you about deterring from nuclear attacks ( unless needed as outlined above)


nuclear energy

disclaimer: Everything above is in relation to nuclear warfare not energy. Nuclear energy is the use of nuclear fission to harness the energy emitted by the splitting of atoms, this source of power is the cleanest in Orbis and has little to no negative impacts apart from the expensive operation and upkeep of nuclear power plants. This is the cleanest, most powerful method of energy yet most expensive.


bulletins:

 https://politicsandwar.com/bulletin/id=16848/are-nukes-to-blame-for-food-shortages

https://politicsandwar.com/bulletin/id=16884/the-nuclear-food-debate

https://politicsandwar.com/bulletin/id=19258/orbis-nuclear-report

"i am become death, destroyer of worlds"

J.Rober Oppenheimer 'Director of Manhatten project'

"I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and, to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says 'now i am become death, the destroyer of worlds'..." 

video here

Nuclear reports [numberL] = Launches in 24h